Further to the publication of the results of the public consultation on the Implementation of Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018, we have sent the following letter to Christina McKelvie, Minister for Older People and Equalities:
Dear Ms McKelvie,
Re: Consultation on Implementation of the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018
Now that the analysis of responses to the above consultation have been published could you please provide an expected date for when the Government will be issuing a formal response to its outcome?
Given that this was the first time the public were consulted on the way in which the Act defined “woman” it is clear that there is substantial opposition to both this, and to the proposed guidance. We would appreciate clarification on whether the Government intends to proceed with enforcement of the Act and, if so, the reasons for doing so.
In addition, we would be interested in what legal advice has been given to the Government as to whether it is lawful to redefine the protected characteristics of the Equality Act in discrete legislation.
A group of senior lawyers recently wrote this letter in response to the TIE letter which was printed in the National and the Herald earlier this month. We believe it is vital that the misrepresentations of the legal position as expressed in the TIE letter are corrected, and are pleased to be able to publish this rebuttal.
Engender, who describe themselves as Scotland’s feminist organisation, have published an open letter following criticism of themselves and other officially funded women’s groups by MSP Joan McAlpine.
Engender’s opening gambit is to announce that they “neither ‘represent women and girls’, nor make any claim to.” This is quite an admission from a supposedly feminist group and rather begs the question what purpose Engender serves. They state that their “expertise comes from feminist scholarship, evidence drawn from delivery of services and programmes, and work with women and a wide range of women’s groups.” It would appear that Engender’s rather rarified expertise is from a rather narrow version of third wave feminist scholarship, while their “wide range” of women’s groups excludes all those who disagree on points of policy. We should note here that Forwomen.Scot members include those with decades of front line feminist activism – including at Greenham and Faslane and those who campaigned for gay rights when the stigma of AIDS overshadowed the community – as well as lawyers, academics, medics and those involved at the coal face of women’s services.
Ahead of the census debate we are concerned that the definitions of male and female in Scots Law and practice need to be robust and that appropriate protections can also be put in place for the trans community through proper data gathering. But conflating sex and gender serves no-one and hurts many.
Briefing Notes: Stage One Debate on the Census (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill
For Women Scotland was delighted to have had the opportunity to give evidence at committee stage regarding proposed changes to the 2021 census.
We fully support the proposal to gather data with regard to gender identity and sexual orientation and, due to the sensitive nature of these questions, that this should be done on a voluntary basis. The census is an ideal way to gather detail on small populations to better enable provisions.
The committee also considered calls to conflate sex and gender identity within the compulsory M/F question or to add the category “other”. The Stage 1 report was clear in recommending that these characteristics should remain distinct and that a non-binary option should not be added.
Exterion Media, the company that controls advertising space for Lothian Buses, refused to display the dictionary definition of the word “woman” on the grounds that the message was “likely to offend” the general public.
Given that the photograph of the sticker was taken from a tweet posted online on 17 August we are really not sure how they failed to contact us for comment before publishing the article. Here is our response:
We are a group of 51 women from various professions and walks of life across Scotland, and who are very concerned at the climate of misogyny and violent threats against women currently being fomented by the culture of trans ideology.
This is not the first time that he has displayed such impulses, previously having attacked those who want 50/50 representation as ‘feminist shite’.
Gillian Martin’s non-aggressive comments of some years ago had consequences for her but GregorMurray’s behaviour, which is recent and repeated, have had no such repercussions for him. We call upon you to send a clear message, that discourse around these matters must be respectful and non-threatening. The fact that this person identifies as non-binary clearly hasn’t prevented him from adopting intimidating behaviour typical of male aggressors, and promoting blatant sexism. Women’s and children’s rights are not safe in his hands. He is not acceptable as an ‘equalities spokesperson’,noras convenor of a children and families committee. We call upon you to stand up for women and send a message that this language and behaviour will not be tolerated in the SNP.